<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media in the Classroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonegan.net/2008/10/10/social-media-in-the-classroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonegan.net/2008/10/10/social-media-in-the-classroom/</link>
	<description>Marketing Measurement, Site Optimization, Web Analytics, Omniture SiteCatalyst, Omniture Test&#38;Target &#38; Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Ovenell-Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonegan.net/2008/10/10/social-media-in-the-classroom/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Ovenell-Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonegan.net/?p=20#comment-80</guid>
		<description>The technology is welcome, but not revolutionary, not really. I&#039;ve written a little about this on my own blog www.primorisres.wordpress.com. The chalkboard was once spoken of in the same breathless voice we now use for Web 2.0 technologies. We&#039;ve been socializing one way or another for thousands of years. And there are many (ancient) cultures in the world--Canadian First Nations among them--built entirely around socially constructed knowledge.

The big challenge will be for leadership: where there is a will there is a way. The old classroom, if I can use that shorthand, is sustained by systems that extend in all directions way beyond the bricks and mortar of the school; down to the family, up to national notions of education. All of that needs to be brought in line.

Having said that, I think that in the end, after any switch to the new technologies Egan writes about, we&#039;ll see that things will not be all that different. Education is fundamentally teleological. How we reach for the ends may change--indeed it could use a shake up--but we&#039;re still after the same thing as we ever were and always will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technology is welcome, but not revolutionary, not really. I&#8217;ve written a little about this on my own blog <a href="http://www.primorisres.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.primorisres.wordpress.com</a>. The chalkboard was once spoken of in the same breathless voice we now use for Web 2.0 technologies. We&#8217;ve been socializing one way or another for thousands of years. And there are many (ancient) cultures in the world&#8211;Canadian First Nations among them&#8211;built entirely around socially constructed knowledge.</p>
<p>The big challenge will be for leadership: where there is a will there is a way. The old classroom, if I can use that shorthand, is sustained by systems that extend in all directions way beyond the bricks and mortar of the school; down to the family, up to national notions of education. All of that needs to be brought in line.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think that in the end, after any switch to the new technologies Egan writes about, we&#8217;ll see that things will not be all that different. Education is fundamentally teleological. How we reach for the ends may change&#8211;indeed it could use a shake up&#8211;but we&#8217;re still after the same thing as we ever were and always will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

